1.4: Chemistry Concepts III
- Page ID
- 216878
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\dsum}{\displaystyle\sum\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dint}{\displaystyle\int\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dlim}{\displaystyle\lim\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)
\( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)
\( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\(\newcommand{\longvect}{\overrightarrow}\)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)Characteristic Chemical Reactions
Chemical reactions occur when two or more atoms bond together to form molecules or when bonded atoms break apart. We call the substances that "go in" to a chemical reaction reactants (by convention, we usually list these on the left side of a chemical equation), and the substances found that "come out" of the reaction products (by convention, we usually list these on the right side of a chemical equation). An arrow drawn between reactants and products typically shows the direction of the chemical reaction. By convention, for one-way reactions (a.k.a. unidirectional), reactants are listed on the left and products on the right of the single-headed arrow. However, you should be able to identify reactants and products of unidirectional reactions that are written in any orientation (e.g. right-to-left; top-to-bottom, diagonal right-to-left, around a circular arrow, etc.) by using the arrow to orient yourself.
In chemical reactions, the atoms and elements present in the reactant(s) must all also be present in the product(s). Similarly, there can be nothing present in the products that was not present in the reactants. This is because chemical reactions are governed by the law of conservation of mass, which states that matter cannot be created nor destroyed in a chemical reaction. This means that when you examine a chemical reaction, you must try to account for everything that goes in AND make sure that you can find it all in the stuff that comes out!
Just as you can express mathematical calculations in equations such as 2 + 7 = 9, you can use chemical equations to show how reactants become products. By convention, chemical equations are typically read or written from left to right. Reactants on the left are separated from products on the right by a single- or double-headed arrow indicating the direction in which the chemical reaction proceeds. For example, the chemical reaction in which one atom of nitrogen and three atoms of hydrogen produce ammonia would be written as:
\[\ce{N + 3H→NH_3}.\]
Correspondingly, the breakdown of ammonia into its components would be written as:
\[\ce{NH3→N + 3H.}\]
Note that in either direction, you find 1 N and 3 Hs on both sides of the equation.
Possible NB Discussion
Point
In General Biology courses, it is important to appreciate the law of the conservation of mass in the context of biological processes. In chemistry, you will take a quantitative approach to this topic, learning to balance equations, and making sure that the total number of atoms and the total charge does not change. In General Biology, we take a more qualitative approach to the topic. Do you think this leads to confusion? Should we place more emphasis on balancing equations in General Biology?
Reversibility
While all chemical reactions can technically proceed in both directions, some reactions tend to favor one direction over the other. Depending on the degree to which a reaction spontaneously proceed in either both or one direction a different name can be given to characterize the reactions reversibility. Some chemical reactions, such as the one shown above, proceed mostly in one direction with the "reverse" direction happening on such long time scales or with such low probability that, for practical purposes, we ignore the "reverse" reaction. These unidirectional reactions are also called irreversible reactions and are depicted with a single-headed (unidirectional) arrow. By contrast, reversible reactions are those that can readily proceed in either direction. Reversible reactions are usually depicted by a chemical equation with a double-headed arrow pointing toward both the reactants and the products. In practice, you will find a continuum of chemical reactions; some proceed mostly in one direction and nearly never reverse, while others change direction easily depending on various factors like the relative concentrations of reactants and products. These terms are just ways of describing reactions with different equilibrium points.
You may have realized that the terms "reactants" and "products" are relative to the direction of the reaction. If you have a reaction that is reversible, though, the products of running the reaction in one direction become the reactants of the reverse. You can label the same compound with two different terms. That can be a bit confusing. So, what is one to do in such cases? The answer is that if you want to use the terms "reactants" and "products", you must be clear about the direction of reaction that you are referring to - even for when discussing reversible reactions. The choice of terms, "reactants" or "products" that you use will communicate to others the directionality of the reaction that you are considering.
Let's look at an example of a reversible reaction in biology and discuss an important extension of these core ideas that arises in a biological system. In human blood, excess hydrogen ions (H+) bind to bicarbonate ions (HCO3-), forming an equilibrium state with carbonic acid (H2CO3). This reaction is readily reversible. If carbonic acid were added to this system, some of it would be converted to bicarbonate and hydrogen ions as the chemical system sought out equilibrium.
\[\ce{HCO_3^−+ H^+\rightleftharpoons H_2CO_3}\]
The example above examines and "idealized" chemical systems as it might occur in a test-tube. In biological systems, however, equilibrium for a single reaction is rarely reached as it might be in the test-tube. In biological systems, reactions do not occur in isolation. Rather, the concentrations of the reactants and/or products are constantly changing, often with a product of one reaction being a reactant for another reaction. These linked reactions form what are known as biochemical pathways. The immediate example below illustrates this point. While the reaction between the bicarbonate/proton and carbonic acid is highly reversible, it turns out that, physiologically, this reaction is usually "pulled" toward the formation of carbonic acid. Why? As shown below, carbonic acid becomes a reactant for another biochemical reaction—the conversion of carbonic acid to CO2 and H2O. This conversion reduces the concentration of H2CO3, thus pulling the reaction between bicarbonate and H+ to the right. Moreover, a third, unidirectional reaction, the removal of CO2 and H2O from the system, also pulls the reaction further to the right. These kinds of reactions are important contributors to maintaining the H+ homeostasis of our blood.
\[ \ce{HCO_3^- + H^+ \rightleftharpoons H_2CO_3 \rightleftharpoons CO_2 + H_20 \rightarrow} \text{ waste}\]
The reaction involving the synthesis of carbonic acid is actually linked to its breakdown into \(CO_2\) and \(H_2O\). These products are then removed from the system/body when they are exhaled. Together, the breakdown of carbonic acid and the act of exhaling the products pull the first reaction to the right.
Synthesis reactions
Many macromolecules are made from smaller subunits, or building blocks, called monomers. Monomers covalently link to form larger molecules known as polymers. Often, the synthesis of polymers from monomers will also produce water molecules as products of the reaction. This type of reaction is known as dehydration synthesis or condensation reaction.

Figure 1. In the dehydration synthesis reaction depicted above, two molecules of glucose are linked together to form the disaccharide maltose. In the process, a water molecule is formed. Attribution: Marc T. Facciotti (original work)
Interactive Figure 1. The molecules of glucose and maltose depicted as 3D interactive molecules.
| Glucose | Maltose |
In a dehydration synthesis reaction (Figure 1), the hydrogen of one monomer combines with the hydroxyl group of another monomer, releasing a molecule of water. At the same time, the monomers share electrons and form covalent bonds. As additional monomers join, this chain of repeating monomers forms a polymer. Different types of monomers can combine in many configurations, giving rise to a diverse group of macromolecules. Even one kind of monomer can combine in a variety of ways to form several different polymers; for example, glucose monomers are the constituents of starch, glycogen, and cellulose.
In the carbohydrate monomer example above, the polymer is formed by a dehydration reaction; this type of reaction is also used to add amino acids to a growing peptide chain and nucleotides to the growing DNA or RNA polymer. Visit the modules on Amino Acids, Lipids, and Nucleic Acids to see if you can identify the water molecules that are removed when a monomer is added to the growing polymer.

Figure 2. This depicts, using words, (decorated with functional groups colored in red) a generic dehydration synthesis/condensation reaction. Attribution: Marc T. Facciotti (original work)
Hydrolysis reactions
Polymers are broken down into monomers in a reaction known as hydrolysis. A hydrolysis reaction includes a water molecule as a reactant (Figure 3). During these reactions, a polymer can be broken into two components: one product carries a hydrogen ion (H+) from the water, while the second product carries the water's remaining hydroxide (OH–).

Figure 3. In the hydrolysis reaction shown here, the disaccharide maltose is broken down to form two glucose monomers with the addition of a water molecule. Note that this reaction is the reverse of the synthesis reaction shown in Figure 1 above. Attribution: Marc T. Facciotti (original work)
![]()
Figure 4. This depicts using words (decorated with functional groups colored in red) a generic hydrolysis reaction. Attribution: Marc T. Facciotti (original work)
Dehydration synthesis and hydrolysis reactions are catalyzed, or “sped up,” by specific enzymes. Note that both dehydration synthesis and hydrolysis reactions involve the making and breaking of bonds between the reactants—a reorganization of the bonds between the atoms in the reactants. In biological systems (our bodies included), food in the form of molecular polymers is hydrolyzed into smaller molecules by water via enzyme-catalyzed reactions in the digestive system. This allows for the smaller nutrients to be absorbed and reused for a variety of purposes. In the cell, monomers derived from food may then be reassembled into larger polymers that serve new functions.
Helpful links:
Visit this site to see visual representations of dehydration synthesis and hydrolysis.
Example of Hydrolysis with Enzyme Action is shown in this 3 minute video entitled: Hydrolysis of Sucrose by Sucrase.
Exchange/transfer reactions
We will also encounter reactions termed exchange reactions. In these types of reactions, "parts" of molecules are transferred between one another—bonds are broken to release a part of a molecule and bonds are formed between the released part and another molecule. These enzyme-catalyzed reactions are usually reasonably complex multi-step chemical processes.

Figure 5. An exchange reaction in which both synthesis and hydrolysis can occur, chemical bonds are both formed and broken, is depicted using a word analogy.
Chemical equilibrium—Part 1: forward and reverse reactions
Understanding the concept of chemical equilibrium is critical to following several of the discussions that we have in general biology and indeed throughout biology and the sciences. It is difficult to completely describe the concept of chemical equilibrium without reference to the energy of a system, but for the sake of simplicity, let’s try anyway and reserve the discussion of energy for another chapter. Let us, rather, begin developing our understanding of equilibrium by considering the reversible reaction below:

Hypothetical reaction #1: A hypothetical reaction involving compounds A, B and D. If we read this from left to right, we would say that A and B come together to form a larger compound: D. Reading the reaction from right to left, we would say that compound D breaks down into smaller compounds: A and B.
We first need to define what is meant by a “reversible reaction.” The term “reversible” simply means that a reaction can proceed in both directions. That is, the things on the left side of the reaction equation can react together to become the things on the right of the equation, AND the things on the right of the equation can also react together to become the things on the left side of the equation. Reactions that only proceed in one direction are called irreversible reactions.
To start our discussion of equilibrium, we begin by considering a reaction that we posit is readily reversible. In this case, it is the reaction depicted above: the imaginary formation of compound D from compounds A and B. Since it is a reversible reaction, we could also call it the decomposition of D into A and B. Let us, however, imagine an experiment in which we watch the reaction proceed from a starting point where only A and B are present.
Example #1: Left-balanced reaction
| Concentration | t=0 | t=1 | t=5 | t=10 | t=15 | t=20 | t=25 | t=30 | t=35 | t=40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [A] | 100 | 90 | 80 | 70 | 65 | 62 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 |
| [B] | 100 | 90 | 80 | 70 | 65 | 62 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 |
| [D] | 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 45 | 38 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 |
At time t = 0 (before the reaction starts), the reaction has 100 concentration units of compounds A and B and zero units of compound D. We now allow the reaction to proceed and observe the individual concentrations of the three compounds over time (t=1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40 time units). As A and B react, D forms. In fact, one can see D forming from t=0 all the way to t=25. After that time, however, the concentrations of A, B and D stop changing. Once the reaction reaches the point where the concentrations of the components stop changing, we say that the reaction has reached equilibrium. Notice that the concentrations of A, B, and D are not equal at equilibrium. In fact, the reaction seems left balanced so that there is more A and B than D.
Many students fall victim to the misconception that the concentrations of a reaction’s reactants and products must be equal at equilibrium. Given that the term equilibrium sounds a lot like the word “equal,” this is not surprising. But as the experiment above tries to illustrate, this is NOT correct!
Example #2: right-balanced reaction
We can examine a second hypothetical reaction, the synthesis of compound \(\ce{J}\) from the compounds \(\ce{E}\) and \(\ce{F}\).
\[ \ce{E +F <=> J} \nonumber\]
Hypothetical reaction #2: A hypothetical reaction involving compounds E, F and J. If we read this from left to right, we would say that E and F come together to form a larger compound: J. Reading the reaction from right to left, we would say that compound J breaks down into smaller compounds: E and F.
The structure of hypothetical reaction #2 looks identical to that of hypothetical reaction #1, which we considered above—two things come together to make one bigger thing. We just need to assume, in this case, that E, F, and J have different properties from A, B, and D. Let’s imagine a similar experiment to the one described above and examine this data:
Hypothetical reaction #2: time course

In this case, the reaction also reaches equilibrium. This time, however, equilibrium occurs at around t=30. After that point, the concentrations of E, F, and J do not change. Note again that the concentrations of \(\ce{E}\), \(\ce{F}\), and \(\ce{J}\) are not equal at equilibrium. In contrast to hypothetical reaction #1 (the ABD reaction), this time the concentration of J, the thing on the right side of the arrows, is at a higher concentration than E and F. We say that, for this reaction, equilibrium lies to the right.
Four more points need to be made at this juncture.
- Point 1: Whether equilibrium for a reaction lies to the left or the right will be a function of the properties of the components of the reaction and the environmental conditions that the reaction is taking place in (e.g., temperature, pressure, etc.).
- Point 2: We can also talk about equilibrium using concepts of energy, and we will do this soon, just not yet.
- Point 3: While hypothetical reactions #1 and #2 appear to reach a point where the reaction has “stopped,” you should imagine that reactions are still happening even after equilibrium has been reached. At equilibrium the “forward” and “reverse” reactions are just happening at the same rate. That is, in example #2, at equilibrium J is forming from E and F at the same rate that it is breaking down into E and F. This explains how the concentrations of the compounds aren’t changing despite the fact that the reactions are still happening.
- Point 4: From this description of equilibrium, we can define something we call the equilibrium constant. Typically, the constant is represented by an uppercase K and may be written as Keq. In terms of concentrations, Keq is written as the mathematical product of the reaction product concentrations (stuff on the right) divided by the mathematical product of the reactant concentrations (stuff on the left). For example, Keq,1 = [D]/[A][B], and Keq,2 = [J]/[E][F]. The square brackets "[]" indicate the “concentration of” whatever is inside the bracket.
Possible NB Discussion
Point
The following statement is true: A chemical equilibrium can be established starting with equal concentrations of reactants and products. Can you think of and describe other starting conditions for which a chemical equilibrium can also be established? Are there any starting conditions for which a chemical equilibrium can NOT be established?
The Role of Acid/Base Chemistry in General Biology
We have learned that the behavior of chemical functional groups depends on the composition, order, and properties of their constituent atoms. We will see that pH, a measure of the hydrogen ion concentration of a solution, can alter the chemical properties of some key biological functional groups in ways that change how they interact with other molecules and thus their biological role.
For example, depending on the pH, some functional groups on the amino acid that make up proteins can exist in different chemical states. We will learn that the chemical state of these functional groups can have a profound effect on the shape of the protein or on its ability to carry out chemical reactions. As we move through the course, we will see many examples of this type of chemistry in different contexts.
In pure water, hydrogen ions are spontaneously generated by the dissociation (ionization) of a small percentage of water molecules into equal numbers of hydrogen (H+) ions and hydroxide (OH-) ions. The OH- that result from the ionization of water departs into the sea of water molecules interacting with other molecules through polar interactions, while the now "free" (unbonded) H+ ions produced by the ionization associates with water molecules (line two of the figure below) to create a new molecule called a hydronium ion, H3O+. At some point, the hydroxide ion from line 1 in the figure below will rejoin with a proton and reform another water molecule. This process of dissociation and re-association between hydroxide and hydrogen ions happens continuously at equilibrium.
While most H+ ions in solution really exist as H3O+ ions, we usually represent the H3O+ in figures or equations more simply as H+. Why? Because it is easier. Just remember that since nearly all chemistry in biology happens in water that when you see H+ referred to in the text, figures, or in equations, it usually represents H3O+.

Figure 1: Water spontaneously dissociates into a proton and hydroxyl group. The proton will combine with a water molecule forming a hydronium ion.
Attribution: Marc T. Facciotti
While some paradoxes to this rule can be found in the chemistry of concentrated solutions, in General Biology, it is convenient to formally define pH as:
|
\[ pH = -\log_{10} [H^+]\] |
In the equation above, the square brackets surrounding [H+] indicate concentration. If necessary, try a math review at wiki-logarithm or kahn-logarithm. Also see: definition-concentration or wiki-concentration. The pH of a solution is therefore a measure of the concentration of hydrogen ions in a solution (or the number of hydronium ions).
The pH is typically reported on a logarithmic pH scale that ranges from 0 to 14 (Figure 2). We define pH=7.0 as neutral. We call anything with a pH below 7.0 acidic and any reported pH above 7.0 alkaline or basic. Extremes in pH in either direction from 7.0 are often considered inhospitable to life, although examples exist to the contrary. pH levels in the human body usually range between 6.8 and 7.4, except in the stomach where the pH is more acidic, typically between 1 and 2. Some microbial species like Sulfolobus acidocaldarius thrive in hyper acidic environments (pH < 3) while others like Natronomonas pharaonis have been found living in lakes with pH > 11. These organisms are classified as "extremophiles" for their abilities to thrive in extreme environments. Proteins from these organisms are sometimes used in industrial processes where their ability to withstand environmental stress is a valued property.
Figure 2: The pH scale ranging from acidic to basic with various biological compounds or substances that exist at that particular pH. Attribution: Marc T. Facciotti
Watch this video for an expanded explanation of pH and its relationship to [H+] and the logarithmic scale.
Let's work out an example to see how the pH scale works.
For reference: 1 mole (mol) of a substance (which can be atoms, molecules, ions, etc.), is defined as being equal to 6.02 x 1023 particles of the substance. Therefore, 1 mole of water is equal to 6.02 x 1023 water molecules.
Mathematically this can be written as:
1 mol = 6.02x1023 particles in a substance
1 mol H2O = 6.02x1023 water molecules
Example: The concentration of hydrogen ions dissociating from pure water is approximately 1 × 10-7 moles H+ ions per liter of water. The pH is calculated as the negative of the base 10 logarithm of this unit of concentration. The log10 of 1×10-7 is -7.0, and the negative of this number yields a pH of 7.0 (neutral pH).
Mathematically this can be represented as:
pH = -log10[H+]
pH = -log10[1×10-7]
pH = 7.0 (neutral pH)
The figure below provides another way to visualize the inverse relationship between proton and hydroxide ion concentrations by graphically illustrating how proton concentration decreases as pH increases while the hydroxide ion concentration simultaneously increases.

Figure 3: A graphical representation of acidity and basicity. This figure illustrates the relationship between H+ and OH- concentrations on the pH scale. At low pH values H+ ions are plentiful. As the pH increases the relative abundance of OH- ions increase while H+ abundance decreases.
Attribution: Mary O. Aina
The inverse relationship between pH and the concentration of protons confuses many students - take the time to convince yourself that you "get it." One way could be to predict whether different pH values are acidic or basic and then do the calculations to make sure. Start by trying these practice questions.
Acids and Bases
Acids and bases are molecules that can influence the pH of a solution. In General Biology it is often convenient to use the Brønsted-Lowry definition of acids and bases. Using this formalism we define:
Acids = molecules that can donate a proton to another molecule (including water to form a hydronium ion)
Bases = molecules that can accept a proton from another molecule (including hydronium ions)
When protons from acidic molecules dissociate from their "parent" they increase the H+ concentration and thereby lower the pH of the solution. By contrast, when a base absorbs a "free" proton from a solution onto the "parent" molecule, the decrease in proton concentration in solution results in a shift to higher pH values.
Generically we can represent acids and bases as follows:

Figure 4: Generic Acids and Bases. This figure shows the behavior of Brønsted-Lowry acids and bases. The acid (A in a light purple circle) starts in a protonated form bound to an H+ ion, drawn as a red H. The acid deprotonates, shedding its H+ into solution or to another molecule. Meanwhile the base (B in a light green circle) begins deprotonated and absorbs a proton (red H+) from solution or other molecule.
Attribution: Marc T. Facciotti
In the figure above, the molecule A- - the deprotonated form of the acid AH - can also be referred to as the conjugate base of the acid AH. Likewise the molecule BH+ - the protonated form of the base B - can be referred to as the conjugate acid of the base B.
We call acids that completely dissociate into A- and H+ ions at equilibrium strong acids. These reactions are characterized by an equilibrium position that lies far to the right (favoring product formation) and their chemical equations are often drawn with a single arrow separating reactants and products. By contrast, acids that do NOT completely dissociate into A- and H+ ions at equilibrium are called weak acids. Depending on the pH, it is common to find both protonated and deprotonated forms of the weak acid (or both the acid and it's conjugate base) in solution at the same time. The chemical equations representing these reactions are therefore usually depicted with double arrows, indicating that the protonation/deprotonation of A-/AH, respectively, is reversible.
Two important examples of weak acids/bases in biology are the carboxyl and amino functional groups. At physiological pH values (around pH = 7) the carboxyl group tends to behave as an acid by donating it's proton to solution or other molecules. Under the same conditions, the amino group tends to act as a base, absorbing protons from solution or other molecules. As we will soon see, these and other protonation/deprotonation reactions play key roles in many biological processes.

Figure 5: The carboxylic acid group acts as an acid by releasing a proton. This can increase the number of protons in solution and thus decrease the pH. The amino group acts as a base by accepting hydrogen ions, which can decrease the number of hydrogen ions in solutions, thus increasing the pH.
Attribution: Marc T. Facciotti (original work)
pKa 
pKa is defined as the negative log10 of the dissociation constant of an acid, its Ka.
pKa = -log10[Ka]
The pKa is a quantitative measure of how readily an acid gives up a proton to a solution and is thus a measure of the "strength" of the acid. Strong acids have a small pKa, weak acids have a larger pKa.
As noted, the carboxylic acid functional group R-COOH is found in many biomolecules. This functional group has a pKa between 2-4 in aqueous solution and is considered a weak acid. At many biologically relevant pH values, the carboxylic acid only partially dissociates into H+ cations and R-COO- anions. In a population of molecules containing the carboxylic acid functional group, it is not uncommon - at biologically relevant pH values - to simultaneously find molecules in both the protonated (R-COOH) and deprotonated (R-COO-) forms. By contrast, HCl (hydrogen chloride), a common strong acid, has a pKa << 0. This means that it will fully dissociate into H+ and Cl- at all biologically relevant pH values. HCl is a strong acid and will almost never be found in the protonated form.
One of the key ways we depict the difference between a strong acid or base and a weak acid or base in chemical equations is the use of a single arrow (strong acid/base) versus a double arrow (weak acid/base). The full dissociation of proton(s) from strong acids at equilibrium means that the likelihood of protons returning to the molecule they dissociated from is very small. The reaction goes mostly one way, hence the single arrow. In weak acids, the likelihood of the forward reaction happening is more similar to the likelihood of the reverse reaction happening. The consequence of this is partial dissociation at equilibrium, hence the double arrow in the chemical equation.

Figure 1. An example of strong acids, weak acids, strong bases, and weak bases in their biologically relevant protonated and deprotonated states. The value of their pKa is shown on the left. Attribution: Marc T. Facciotti.
In General Biology some instructors may ask you to relate pH and pKa to each other when discussing the protonation state of a weak acid or weak base in, for example, amino acids. How can we use the information given in this module to answer the question: Will the functional groups on the amino acid Glutamate be protonated or deprotonated at a pH of 2, at a pH of 8, or at a pH of 11?
To answer this kind of question, we need to create a relationship between pH and pKa. The relationship between pKa and pH is mathematically represented by the Henderson-Hasselbach equation shown below, where [A-] represents the deprotonated form of the acid and [HA] represents the protonated form of the acid.
Figure 2. The Henderson-Hasselbach equation
This equation has three core "parts":
1. The pH;
2. The pKa; and
3. log10[A-]/[HA].
Part 1 tells you about the proton concentration. Part 2 tells you about a property of the acid - how likely it is to "give up" its protons to solution. Part 3 tells you about how much of the acid is in its deprotonated form [A-] and in its protonated form [HA]. In most experimental conditions we usually assume that the pKa doesn't change (after all, it's a property of the molecule). So, this equation tells us that the pH and the ratio of deprotonated [A-] and protonated [HA] form of the acid are related to one another. If you are able to independently control the pH by adding more acid or base, you can control the ratio of deprotonated [A-] and protonated [HA] forms of the acid. You can, of course, use the Henderson-Hasselbach equation to solve the problem of knowing the protonation state of Glutamate's functional groups at different pHs. However, we can also develop an intuition about the relationship between these three quantities.
Titrations can help develop an intuitive understanding
Another useful way to develop an intuitive understanding of the relationship between pH, pKa and the protonation states of functional groups is to think about the results of a titration. The titration experiment typically involves the slow, stepwise, and gradual addition of one reagent (e.g. Reagent #1) into a mixture of other molecules (e.g. Solution #1). The experimenter slowly adds Reagent #1 (independent variable) into Solution #1 and makes observations of one or more properties (dependent variables) of the mixture after every step. Depending on the reagents, observations can be things like a change in color, change in viscosity, change in taste, or change in pH. The experimental data is usually plotted in a graph with increasing Reagent #1 on the x-axis and the measured solution property (e.g pH, color, viscosity, etc.) plotted on the y-axis.
Interpreting a Titration Graph
Below is a graph showing the titration of a solution of acetic acid (Solution #1). Acetic acid, the acid found in vinegar, can also be represented by the chemical formula CH3COOH and contains a single carboxyl functional group. In this experiment, the acetic acid is titrated with a base, represented as “OH” (Reagent #1) in the figure. The graph when read from left to right reports the change in pH of the solution when base (OH) is slowly added. Examining the graph, you see three phases of pH change:
(a) Adding between 0 to about 3 equivalents of OH- causes a rapid rise of the pH. At the molecular level, this rise can be explained by each additional base equivalent reacting with H3O+ to create two neutral water molecules. This reduces the [H+] and therefore increases the pH. At this pH, the molecule (CH3COOH) has the "strength" to hold onto its H+ ions.
(b) When between 3 and 7 equivalents of OH are added, the pH hardly changes; it stays stable around a value equivalent to the pKa of CH3COOH (4.76). In this zone of the chart, acetic acid molecules start to "let go" of their H+ ions when OH is added. Each OH added “grabs” a proton from solution which is replaced by a proton “released” by CH3COOH molecules in solution. When the pH = pKa (around 5 equivalents of OH-), the Henderson-Hasselbach equation tells us that 50% of the acetic acid molecules in solution are protonated and 50% are deprotonated. As more equivalents of OH are added, more acetic acid molecules become deprotonated until all acetic acid molecules become deprotonated.
(c) Once this happens, at 7 or more equivalents of OH, no more protonated molecules are available to neutralize added OH. Adding more OH therefore starts rapidly raising the pH again.
Building a mental picture of this process can be a powerful tool to help you intuitively solve the problem that started this discussion. If you want to intuit the protonation state of a functional group, with a known pKa, at a given pH, you can start by imagining the situation when the pH = pKa. At this point, you know that the functional group is 50% protonated and 50% deprotonated. Therefore, if the pH in question is below the pKa moving from the pH = pKa to the target pH requires adding protons to the solution. When the solution becomes more acidic, there will be more H+ ions ready to protonate deprotonated functional groups and thus increasing the amount of protonated functional groups. On the titration curve below, this is like starting at the center of the flat portion of the curve and moving to the left. When the target pH is higher than the pKa the solution must become more basic in the shift from the starting pH to the target pH. Here, there will be fewer H+ ions than at the beginning, meaning that the functional groups will start to deprotonate thus increasing the proportion of unprotonated functional groups.

Figure 3. This graph depicts the protonation state of acetic acid as the pH changes. At a pH below the
This movie provides a visual demonstration of the explanation given above.
We close this section by returning to the original question: Will the functional groups on the amino acid glutamate be protonated or deprotonated at a pH of 2, at a pH of 8, at a pH of 11? In the example of acetic acid above, we developed an understanding of how to relate the protonation state of one functional group to its pKa and the pH of the solution its in to the balance/ratio of protonated to deprotonated state for a single functional group.
In biology, however, you will often be interested in the behavior of molecules with multiple functional groups, each with their own pKa values. An free amino acid like glutamate has three different functional groups, each with their own pKa. So, answering the question about the protonation state of glutamate at different pH values requires you to assess the protonation state and deprotonation state of each of those functional groups independently. The figure below shows a titration experiment for amino acid glutamate. Like the plot above, it shows the relationship between the pH and pKa for each of the three ionizable functional groups of glutamate. The protonation state of functional group can be evaluated independently at a specified pH value to ultimately determine the protonation state of the whole molecule.
Figure 4. This graph depicts the protonation state of glutamate as the pH changes. At a pH below the pKa for each functional group on the amino acid, the functional group is protonated. At a pH above the pKa for the functional group it is deprotonated. If the pH equals the pKa, the functional group is 50% protonated and 50% deprotonated.
Attribution: Ivy Jose
Quick Reference: pKa and pH Comparison Chart
| pKa | pH |
| pKa = -log10[Ka] | pH= −log10[H+] |
|
|
|
|
|
• While pKa depends largely on the physical properties of a molecule, it can also be influenced/changed by the local environment the molecule finds itself in. |
|
Additional pH resources
Here are some additional links on pH and pKa to help learn the material. Note that there is an additional module devoted to pKa.
ChemLibreText Links
- Determining and calculating pH
- pH and pKa
- This has an expanded discussion about pH that is a bit more detailed than how we present the concept.
Khan Academy Links
Simulations
- Acid-base simulation. -------
- ----------embed this in document---------





