26.1.1 Types of RNA
Structurally speaking, ribonucleic acid (RNA), is quite similar to DNA. However, whereas DNA molecules are typically long and double stranded, RNA molecules are much shorter and are typically single stranded. A ribonucleotide within the RNA chain contains ribose (the pentose sugar), one of the four nitrogenous bases (A, U, G, and C), and a phosphate group. The subtle structural difference between the sugars gives DNA added stability, making DNA more suitable for storage of genetic information, whereas the relative instability of RNA makes it more suitable for its more short-term functions. The RNA-specific pyrimidine uracil forms a complementary base pair with adenine and is used instead of the thymine that is found in DNA. Even though RNA is single stranded, most types of RNA molecules show extensive intramolecular base pairing between complementary sequences within the RNA strand, creating a predictable three-dimensional structure essential for their function (Figures 26.1.1 and 26.1.2).
RNA can largely be divided into two types, one that carries the code for making proteins or coding RNA, which is also called messenger RNA (mRNA), and non-coding RNA (ncRNA). The ncRNA can be subdivided into several different types, depending either on the length of the RNA or on the function. Size classification begins with the short ncRNAs (~20–30 nt), which include microRNAs (miRs), and small interfering (siRNAs); the small ncRNAs up to 200 nt, which include transfer RNA (tRNA), small nuclear RNA (snRNA), and small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA); and long ncRNAs ( > 200 nt), which include ribosomal RNA (rRNA), enhancer RNA (eRNA) and long intergeneic ncRNAs (lincRNAs), among others.
Cells access the information stored in DNA by creating RNA, through the process of transcription, which then directs the synthesis of proteins through the process of translation. The three main types of RNA directly involved in protein synthesis are messenger RNA (mRNA), ribosomal RNA (rRNA), and transfer RNA (tRNA). The mRNA carries the message from the DNA, which controls all of the cellular activities in a cell. If a cell requires a certain protein to be synthesized, the gene for this product is “turned on” and the mRNA is synthesized through the process of transcription. The mRNA then interacts with ribosomes and other cellular machinery to direct the synthesis of the protein it encodes during the process of translation. mRNA is relatively unstable and short-lived in the cell, especially in prokaryotic cells, ensuring that proteins are only made when needed.
rRNA and tRNA are stable types of RNA. In prokaryotes and eukaryotes, tRNA and rRNA are encoded by the DNA, where they are transcribed into long RNA molecules that are subsequently cut to release smaller fragments containing the individual mature RNA species. In eukaryotes, synthesis, cutting, and assembly of rRNA into ribosomes takes place in the nucleolus region of the nucleus, but these activities occur in the cytoplasm of prokaryotes. Within the nucleolus region, ribosome assembly requires the activity of numerous snoRNAs.
Ribosomes are composed of rRNA and protein. As its name suggests, rRNA is a major constituent of ribosomes, composing up to about 60% of the ribosome by mass and providing the location where the mRNA binds. The rRNA ensures the proper alignment of the mRNA, tRNA, and the ribosomes; the rRNA of the ribosome also has an enzymatic activity (peptidyl transferase) and catalyzes the formation of the peptide bonds between two aligned amino acids during protein synthesis (Figure 26.1.3). Although rRNA had long been thought to serve primarily a structural role, its catalytic role within the ribosome was shown in 2000. Scientists in the laboratories of Thomas Steitz (1940–) and Peter Moore (1939–) at Yale University were able to crystallize the ribosome structure from Haloarcula marismortui, a halophilic archaeon isolated from the Dead Sea. Because of the importance of this work, Steitz shared the 2009 Nobel Prize in Chemistry with other scientists who made significant contributions to the understanding of ribosome structure. The structure and function of ribosomes will be discussed in further detail in Chapter 27.
Transfer RNA (tRNA) is the third prominent type of RNA involved in protein translation. tRNAs are usually only 70–90 nucleotides long. They carry the correct amino acid to the site of protein synthesis in the ribosome. It is the base pairing between the tRNA and mRNA that allows for the correct amino acid to be inserted in the polypeptide chain being synthesized (Figure 26.1.3). Any mutations in the tRNA or rRNA can result in global problems for the cell because both are necessary for proper protein synthesis.
As described previously, some RNA molecules have enzymatic properties and serve as ribozymes. Within this chapter, the activity of snRNAs during the process of intron removal from mRNA sequences function as ribozymes and will be described. Furthermore, a detailed description of the enzymatic features of the ribosome structure will be provided in Chapter 27.
Other small ncRNA and lncRNA molecules play a role in the regulation of transcriptional and translational processes. For example, the post-transcriptional expression levels of many genes can be controlled by RNA interference, in which miRNAs, specific short RNA molecules, pair with mRNA regions and target them for degradation (Figure 26.1.4). This process is aided by protein chaperones called argonautes. This antisense-based process involves steps that first process the miRNA so that it can base-pair with a region of its target mRNAs. Once the base pairing occurs, other proteins direct the mRNA to be destroyed by nucleases. Fire and Mello were awarded the 2006 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for this discovery.
At steady state, the vast majority of human cellular RNA consists of rRNA (∼90% of total RNA for most cells Figure 10.5). Although there is less tRNA by mass, their small size results in their molar level being higher than rRNA (Figure 26.1.5). Other abundant RNAs, such as mRNA, snRNA, and snoRNAs are present in aggregate at levels that are about 1–2 orders of magnitude lower than rRNA and tRNA (Figure 26.1.5). Certain small RNAs, such as miRNA and piRNAs can be present at very high levels; however, this appears to be cell type dependent. lncRNAs are present at levels that are two orders of magnitude less than total mRNA. Although the estimated number of different types of human lncRNAs may have a very restricted expression pattern and thus, accumulate to higher levels within specific cell types. For example, sequencing of mammalian transcriptomes has revealed more than 100,000 different lncRNA molecules can be produced, compared with the approximate 20,000 protein-coding genes. The diversity and functions of the transcriptome within biological processes are currently a highly active area of research.
26.1.2 RNA Polymerase Enzymes
RNA Polymerase Enzymes (RNAPs) are required to carry out the process of transcription and are found in all cells ranging from bacteria to humans. All RNAPs are multi-subunit assemblies, with bacteria having five core subunits that have homologs in archaeal and eukaryotic RNAPs. Bacterial RNAPs are the simplest form of RNA polymerases and provide an excellent system to study how they control transcription.
Prokaryotic RNA Polymerase Enzymes
The RNAP catalytic core within bacteria contains five major subunits (α2ββ'ω) (Fig 26.1.7B). To position this catalytic core onto the correct promoter requires the association of a sixth subunit called the sigma factor (σ). Within bacteria there are multiple different sigma factors that can associate with the catalytic core of RNAP that help to direct the catalytic core to the correct DNA locations where RNAP can then initiate transcription. For example, within E. coli σ70 is the housekeeping sigma factor that is responsible for transcribing most genes in growing cells. It keeps essential genes and pathways operating. Other sigma factors are activated during certain environmental situations, such as σ38 which is activated during starvation or when cells reach the stationary phase. When the sigma subunit associates with the RNAP catalytic core, the RNAP has then formed the holoenzyme. When bound to DNA, the holoenzyme conformation of RNAP can initiate transcription.
Transcription takes place in several stages. To start with, the RNA polymerase holoenzyme locates and binds to promoter DNA. At this stage the RNAP holoenzyme is it the closed conformation (RPc) (Figure 26.1.6). Initial specific binding to the promoter by sigma factors of the holoenzyme, sets in motion conformational changes in which the RNAP molecular machine bends and wraps the DNA with mobile regions of RNAP playing key roles (Figure 26.1.6). Next, RNAP separates the two strands of DNA and exposes a portion of the template strand. At this point, the DNA and the holoenzyme are said to be in an ‘open promoter complex’ (RPo), and the section of promoter DNA that is within it is known as a ‘transcription bubble’ (Figure 26.1.6).
In bacterial systems, the sigma factor locates the transcriptional start site using key DNA sequence elements located at -35 nucleotides and -10 nucleotides from the transcriptional initiation site (Fig 26.1.7A) For RNAP from Thermus aquaticus, the −35 element interacts exclusively with
Eukaryotic RNA Polymerase Enzymes
In eukaryotic cells, three RNAPs share the task of transcription, the first step in gene expression. RNA Polymerase I (Pol I) is responsible for the synthesis of the majority of rRNA transcripts, whereas RNA Polymerase III (Pol III) produces short, structured RNAs such as tRNAs and 5S rRNA. RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) produces all mRNAs and most regulatory and untranslated RNAs.
The three eukaryotic RNA polymerases contain homologs to the the five core subunits found in prokaryotic RNAPs. In addition, the eukaryotic Pol I, Pol II and Pol III have five additional subunits forming a catalytic core that contains 10-subunits (Fig. 26.1.8). The core has a characteristic crab-claw shape which encloses a central cleft that harbors the DNA, and has two channels, one for the substrate NTPs and the other for the RNA product. Two ‘pinchers’, called the ‘clamp’ and ‘jaw’ stabilize the DNA at the downstream end and allow opening and closing of the cleft. For transcription to occur, the enzyme has to maintain a transcription bubble with separated DNA strands, facilitate the addition of nucleotides, translocate along the template, stabilize the DNA:RNA hybrid and finally allow the DNA strands to reanneal. This is achieved by a number of conserved elements in the active site, which include the fork loop(s), rudder, wall, trigger loop and bridge helix.
Apart from the core elements, all eukaryotic RNAPs share two additional, more distantly related subunits that form the stalk. In Pol I and Pol III, the core is further decorated with peripheral subunits grouped as heterodimeric (Pol Iand Pol III) and heterotrimeric (Pol III) subcomplexes. Accordingly, Pol I and Pol III holoenzymes contain 14 and 17 subunits, respectively, compared to the 12-subunit Pol II enzyme (Fig 26.1.9). The peripheral subunits of Pol I and Pol III have been suggested to be homologous to general Pol II transcription factors based on sequence similarity and the location of these subunits on the RNAP core. The Pol Iand Pol III heterodimers are homologous to TFIIF and likewise, the Pol III heterotrimer to TFIIE leading to the notion that during evolution, Pol I and Pol III stably integrated these transcription factor-like subunits into the core enzyme. Pol II, on the otherhand, associates more transiently with general transcription factors that form a preinitiation complex (PIC) and shown in Figure 26.1.9.
26.1.3 Transcription Factors and the Preinitiation Complex (PIC)
Unlike prokaryotic systems which can initiate the recruitment of RNAP holoenzymes directly onto the DNA promoter regions and mediate the conversion of RNAP to the open conformation, eukaryotic RNA polymerases require a host of additional general transcription factors (GTFs), to enable this process. Here we will focus on the activation of RNA Polymerase II as an example of the complexity of eukaryotic transcription initiation.
Class II gene transcription in eukaryotes is a tightly regulated, essential process controlled by a highly complex multicomponent machinery. A plethora of proteins, more than a hundred in humans, are organized in often very large multiprotein assemblies that include a core of General Transcription Factors (GTFs). The GTFs include the factors TFIIA, TFIIB, TFIID, TFIIE, TFIIF, TFIIH, RNA polymerase (RNA pol II), as well as a large number of diverse complexes that act as co-activators, co-repressors, chromatin modifiers and remodelers (Fig. 10.10). Class II gene transcription is regulated at various levels: while assembling on chromatin, before and during transcription initiation, throughout elongation and mRNA processing, and termination. A host of activators and repressors has been reported to regulate transcription, including a central multisubunit complex called the Mediator that helps in the recruitment of GTFs and the activation of RNA Pol II. Here we will focus on the formation of the GTFs that make up the core preinitiation complex (PIC) during transcriptional activation.
Transcription of RNA pol II-dependent genes is triggered by the regulated assembly of the Preinitiation Complex (PIC). PIC formation commences with the binding of TFIID to the core promoter. TFIID is a large megadalton-sized multiprotein complex with around 20 subunits made up of 14 different polypeptides: the TATA-box binding protein (TBP) and the TBP-associated factors (TAFs) (numbered 1–13) (Fig. 26.1.11). Some of the TAF subunits are present in two copies. A key feature in TAFs is the histone fold domain (HFD), which is present in 9 out of 13 TAFs in TFIID. The HFD is a strong protein–protein interaction motif that mediates specific dimerization (Fig 26.1.11). The HFD-containing TAFs are organized in discrete heterodimers, with the exception of TAF10, which is capable of forming dimers with two different TFIID components, TAF3 and TAF8. HFDs and several other structural features of TBP and the TAFs are well conserved between species.
TFIID was shown to adopt an asymmetric, horse-shoe shape with three almost equal-sized lobes (A, B, and C), exhibiting a considerable degree of conformational flexibility with at least two distinct conformations (open and closed) (Fig.26.1.11). The TBP component of TFIID binds with a specific DNA sequenced called the TATA box. This DNA sequence is found about 30 base pairs upstream of the transcription start site in many eukaryotic gene promoters. When TBP binds to a TATA box within the DNA, it distorts the DNA by inserting amino acid side-chains between base pairs, partially unwinding the helix, and doubly kinking it. The distortion is accomplished through a great amount of surface contact between the protein and DNA. TBP binds with the negatively charged phosphates in the DNA backbone through positively charged lysine and arginine amino acid residues. The sharp bend in the DNA is produced through projection of four bulky phenylalanine residues into the minor groove. As the DNA bends, its contact with TBP increases, thus enhancing the DNA-protein interaction. The strain imposed on the DNA through this interaction initiates melting, or separation, of the strands. Because this region of DNA is rich in adenine and thymine residues, which base-pair through only two hydrogen bonds, the DNA strands are more easily separated.
TFIID binding to the core promoter TATA box involves the release of TBP from Lobe A, likely in stages that overcome each of the inhibitory interactions blocking different functional surfaces of TBP (Figure 26.1.12). The interactions of the TAND1 and TAND2 regions of TAF1 with TBP (Figure 26.1.12a,d) are likely to be released (i) as Lobe C engages downstream DNA and positions the upstream promoter region such that it can be ‘scanned’ by TBP (Figure 26.1.12b,e), and (ii) as TFIIA joins the complex via interaction with Lobe B and further stabilizes the location of TBP for DNA interaction (Figure 26.1.12c,f). The final engagement of TBP with the promoter, with the concomitant bending of the DNA, is sterically incompatible with the TBP-TAF11 interaction, and therefore leads to TBP detachment from Lobe A and the opening of the binding site for TFIIB (Figure 26.1.12f), which in turn will engage Pol II, likely bound to TFIIF, thus promoting PIC assembly (Figure 26.1.12g).
Thus, the binding of TFIID to the core-promoter is followed by the recruitment of further GTFs and RNA pol II. Several lines of evidence suggest that this process occurs in a defined, stepwise order and undergoes significant restructuring. First, PIC adopts an inactive state, the “closed” complex, which is incompetent to initiate transcription. In addition to TFIID, TFIIH is also critical for the shift of RNA Pol II from the closed to the open conformation. TFIIH has an ATP-dependent translocase activity within one of its subunits, that opens up about 11 to 15 base pairs around the transcription start site by moving along one DNA strand inducing torsional strain, leading to conformational rearrangements and the positioning of single-stranded DNA to the active site of RNA pol II. In this “open” complex, RNA pol II can enter elongation to transcribe throughout a gene in a highly processive manner without dissociating from the DNA template or losing the nascent RNA.
In most eukaryotes, after synthesizing about 20–100 bases, RNA pol II can pause (Promoter proximal pause) and then disconnect from promoter elements and other components of the transcription machinery, giving rise to a fully functional elongation complex in a process called promoter escape. The promoter-bound components of the PIC, in contrast, remain in place, and thus only TFIIB, TFIIF, and RNA pol II need to be recruited for re-initiation, significantly increasing the transcription rate in subsequent rounds of transcription. Promoter escape is preceded by an abortive transcription in many systems, where multiple short RNA products of 3 to 10 bases in length are synthesized.
In addition to promoter elements within the DNA, enhancer elements are also important for the initiation of transcription. Promoters are defined as DNA elements that recruit transcription complexes for the synthesis of coding and non-coding RNA. Enhancers are defined as DNA elements that positively regulate transcription at promoters over long distances in a position- and orientation-independent manner. However, studies have revealed that many enhancers can recruit Pol II and initiate transcription of enhancer RNA (eRNA), thus blurring the functional distinction between enhancers and promoters (Figure 10.13).
Enhancer transcription produces relatively short ncRNA. Furthermore, transcription at enhancers is unstable and often leads to abortion of elongation. In contrast, transcription initiation at most Pol II promoters is stable and produces long mRNAs. Topological studies revealed that enhancers come in close proximity to target gene promoters during transcription activation. According to current gene activation models, the Mediator complex forms a physical bridge between distant regulatory regions and promoters, thereby promoting looping. Transcription of at least a subset of genes regulated by enhancers occurs in bursts indicating a discontinuous process of transcription complex recruitment, assembly, and/or conversion to elongation competent forms. The bursting phenomenon suggests that enhancer/promoter contacts may be transient and infrequent (Fig 26.1.13).
26.1.4 Transcriptional Elongation and Termination
Prokaryotic Transcriptional Elongation
The rate of transcription elongation by E. coli RNAP is not uniform. RNA synthesis is characterized by pauses, some of which may be brief and resolved spontaneously, whereas others may lead to the transcription elongation complex (TEC) backtracking.
Elongation rate and pausing are determined by template sequence and RNA structure (e.g., stem-loops) and involve at least two components of the RNAP catalytic center, the bridge helix (BH) and trigger loop (TL). Elongation is proposed to occur in three steps (Fig. 26.1.14). First, the TL folds in response to NTP binding. Mutational analyses indicate that this conformational change in the TL can be rate-limiting, and reflects the ability of the incoming NTP to bind to TEC. The second step is the incorporation of the NTP and the release of pyrophosphate. The third step involves the translocation of the RNAP down the DNA Template such that the next RNA nucleotide can be added to the nascent transcript.
Backtracking of TEC may take place after a brief pause in transcription, caused by the thermodynamic properties of nucleic acids sequences surrounding the elongation complex. In addition, misincorporation events render elongation complexes prone to backtracking by at least one bp. In this case, the rescue from backtracking through the cleavage of the 3' end of the erroneous transcript also may be seen as a proofreading reaction. Any backtracking event causes a pause or arrest of transcription elongation, which may limit its overall rate (the average speed of RNAP along the template) or processivity (the fraction of RNAP molecules reaching the end of the gene).
While the general structure of the elongation complex (the transcription bubble, the RNA-DNA hybrid) remains unchanged during backtracking, extension of RNA becomes impossible in this conformation. However, such complexes can be resolved by the hydrolytic activity of RNAP, which cleaves the phosphodiester bond in the active center of the backtracked complex, producing a new RNA 3' end in the active center. For single base backups, the hydrolytic reaction is catalyzed by a flexible domain of RNAP located in the secondary channel called the Trigger Loop (TL; Figure 26.1.15B) and the two metal ions of the active center.
Longer sequences of backtracked TEC can restart when acted upon by GreA/B factors, which restore the 3'-end of the nascent transcript to the active center. GreA and GreB are transcript cleavage factors that act on backtracked elongation complexes. When Gre factors are bound in the secondary channel, Gre factors displace the TL from the active center (Figure 26.1.15). The displacement switches off the relatively slow TL-dependent intrinsic transcript hydrolysis, and imposes the highly efficient Gre-assisted hydrolysis. This efficiency is thought to be due to stabilization of the second catalytic Mg2+ ion and an attacking water molecule by the Gre factors.
Prokaryotic Transcriptional Termination
Transcription termination determines the ends of transcriptional units by disassembling the transcription elongation complex (TEC), thereby releasing RNA polymerases and nascent transcripts from DNA templates. Failure in termination causes transcription readthrough, which yields wasteful and possibly harmful intergenic transcripts. It can also perturb expression of downstream genes when the unterminated TEC sweeps transcription initiation complexes off their promoters or collides with RNA polymerases that transcribe opposite strands.
Transcriptional termination in prokaryotes can be template-encoded and factor-independent (intrinsic termination), or require accessory factors, such as Rho, Mfd and DksA. Intrinsic termination occurs at specific template sequences - an inverted repeat followed by a run of A residues. Termination is driven by formation of a short stem-loop structure in the nascent RNA chain (Figure 26.1.16). RNA synthesis arrests and TEC dissociates at the 7th and 8th U of the run. Formation of the stem-loop dissociates the weak rU:dA hybrid. Stem-loop formation is hindered by upstream complementary RNA sequences that compete with the downstream portion of the stem, as well as by RNA: protein interactions in the RNA exit channel. Intrinsic termination depends critically upon timing. Hairpin folding and transcription of the termination point must be coordinated, so that the complete hairpin is formed by the time RNAP transcribes the termination point. The size of the stem, the sequence of the stem and the length of the loop all affect termination efficiency.
The bridge α-helix in the β' subunit borders the active site and may have roles in both catalysis and translocation. Mutations in the YFI motif (β' 772-YFI-774) affect intrinsic termination as well as pausing, fidelity and translocation of RNAP. One mutation, F773V, abolishes the activity of the λ tR2 intrinsic terminator, although neighboring mutations have little affect on termination. Modeling suggests that this unique phenotype reflects the ability of F773 to interact with the fork domain in the β subunit.
Transcriptional termination can also be dependent upon accessory factors, such as the Rho protein. Transcription termination factor Rho is an essential protein in E. coli first identified for its role in transcription termination at Rho-dependent terminators, and is estimated to terminate ~20% of E. coli transcripts. The rho gene is highly conserved and nearly ubiquitous in bacteria. Rho is an RNA-dependent ATPase with RNA:DNA helicase activity, and consists of a hexamer of six identical monomers arranged in an open circle (Figure 26.1.17A).
Rho binds to single stranded RNA in a complex multi-step pathway that involves two distinct sites on the hexamer. The primary binding site (PBS), distributed on the N-terminal domains around the hexamer (Figure26.1.17B, cyan), ensures initial anchoring of Rho to the transcript at a Rut (Rho utilization) site, a∼70 nucleotides (nt) long, cytidine-rich and poorly-structured RNA sequence. Each Rho monomer contains a subsite capable of binding specifically the base residues of a 5′-YC dimer (Y being a pyrimidine). Biochemical and structural data suggest that Rho initially binds to RNA in an open, ‘lock-washer’ conformation that closes into a planar ring as RNA transfers to the central cavity. There, the ssRNA contacts an asymmetric secondary binding site (SBS) (Fig. 26.1.17B, green), and this step, which presumably is rate-limiting for the overall reaction, leads to motor activation. Upon hydrolysis of ATP, the ssRNA is pulled upon conformational changes of the conserved Q and R loops of the SBS, leading to Rho translocation, and ultimately promoting RNA polymerase (RNAP) dissociation. The molecular mechanism of Rho translocation based on single-molecule fluorescence methods appears to be tethered tracking. The tethered tracking model postulates that Rho maintains its contacts between the PBS and the loading (Rut) site upon translocation (Figure 26.1.17B). This mechanism would allow Rho to maintain its high affinity interaction with Rut, and implies the growing of an RNA loop between the PBS and the SBS upon translocation (Fig 26.1.17B).
Eukaryotic Transcriptional Termination
In eukaryotes, termination of protein-coding gene transcription by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) usually requires a functional polyadenylation (pA) signal, typically a variation of the AAUAAA hexamer. Nascent pre-mRNA is cleaved and the 5′ fragment is polyadenylated at the pA site shortly downstream from the hexamer by cleavage and pA factors (CPFs). Two mechanisms have been suggested for pA-dependent transcription termination. In the allosteric model, the pA signal and/or other termination signals bind with the pA signal downstream region (PDR) and induce reorganization of the Pol II complex. This includes the association or dissociation of endonuclease components such as the CPFs. This causes conformational changes in Pol II and TEC disassembly ensues. In the kinetic model, also known as the “torpedo” model, cleavage at the pA site separates the pre-mRNA from the TEC, which continues synthesizing a downstream nascent transcript. This new transcript is a substrate of XRN2/Rat1p, a processive 5′-to-3′ exoribonuclease that catches up with, and disassembles, the TEC by an unknown mechanism.
The two pA-dependent models are not mutually exclusive, and unified models have been proposed. Loosely conserved pA signal sequences downstream of protein-coding genes bind to components of the polyadenylation factor (CF1) complex leading to assembly of the cleavage and polyadenylation machinery. Termination is coupled to cleavage in a manner that has not yet been completely resolved, however, one of the major factors involved in yeast pA termination is the endonuclease, Ysh1. For example, the depletion of Ysh1 blocks TEC dissociation, but does not cause substantial readthrough at the termination site (Fig. 26.1.18 A&B). These results suggest that Ysh1 does not directly cause the pausing that occurs in the allosteric termination pathway, but rather plays a role in the dissociation of the Pol II complex from the DNA template (Figure 26.1.18A & B). It should be noted that not all pA-dependent termination is dependent on Ysh1 and that other mechanisms of pA-mediated termination still remain to be elucidated.
The mechanisms of termination of Pol II-mediated transcription differ for coding and non-coding transcripts. Coding transcripts and possibly some stable uncharacterized transcripts (SUTs) are nearly always processed at the 3′-end by the cleavage and polyadenylation (pA) machinery and are processed by the pA-dependent termination mechanisms described above. In contrast, ncRNAs are terminated and processed by an alternative pathway that, in yeast, requires the RNA-binding proteins Nrd1 and Nab3, as well as, the RNA helicase Sen1 (Fig 10.18 C). Nrd1 and Nab3 recognize RNA sequence elements downstream of snoRNAs and CUTs and this leads to the association of a complex that contains the DNA/RNA helicase Sen1 and the nuclear exosome. The nuclear exosome is a complex of ribonucleases with 3' to 5' exonuclease and endonuclease activity. It functions to degrade unstable or incorrect RNA transcripts.
Both Nrd1 and Sen1 depletion lead to readthrough transcription of ncRNAs, suggesting their importance in non-pA-dependent transcription termination (Fig 26.1.18 C & D). Furthermore, depletion of Nrd1 also causes the accumulation of longer readthrough ncRNAs, suggesting its role in trafficking ncRNAs to the nuclear exosome following termination.
- Parker, N., Schneegurt, M., Thi Tu, A-H., Lister, P., Forster, B.M. (2019) Microbiology. Openstax. Available at: https://opentextbc.ca/microbiologyopenstax/
- Palazzo, A., and Lee, E.S. (2015) Non-coding RNA: what is function and what is junk? Frontiers in Genetics 6:2 Available at: file:///C:/Users/flatt/AppData/Local/Temp/fgene-06-00002.pdf
- Wikipedia contributors. (2020, July 9). RNA. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 15:30, August 6, 2020, from https://en.Wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=RNA&oldid=966784317
- Burenina, O.Y., Oretskaya, T.S., and Kubareva, E.A. (2017) Non-Coding RNAs As Transcriptional Regulators in Eukaryotes. Acta Naturae 9(4):13-25. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5762824/
- Khatter, H., Vorlander, M.K., and Muller C.W. (2017) RNA polymerase I and III: similar yet unique. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 47:88-94. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959440X17300313
- Wikipedia contributors. (2020, May 8). Sigma factor. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 17:50, August 7, 2020, from https://en.Wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sigma_factor&oldid=955570499
- Bae, B., Felkistov, A., Lass-Napiokowska, A., Landick, R., and Darst, S.A. (2015) Structure of a bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme open protomer complex. eLife 4:e08504. Available at: https://elifesciences.org/articles/08504
- Petrenko, N., Jin, Y., Dong, L., Wong, K.H., and Struhl, K. (2019) Requirements for RNA polymerase II preinitiation complex formation in vivo. eLife 8:e43654. Available at: https://elifesciences.org/articles/43654
- Gupta, K., Sari-Ak, D., Haffke, M., Trowitzsch, S., and Berger, I. (2016) Zooming in on transcription preinitiation. J Mol Biol. 428(12):2581-2591. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4906157/
- Wikipedia contributors. (2020, April 17). TATA-binding protein. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 14:54, August 8, 2020, from https://en.Wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=TATA-binding_protein&oldid=951583592
- Patel, A.B., Greber, B.J., and Nogales, E. (2020) Recent insights into the structure of TFIID, its assembly, and its binding to core promoter. Curr Op Struct Bio 61:17-24. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959440X19301113#fig0010
- Ruff, E.F., Record, Jr., M.T., Artsimovitch, I., (2015) Initial events in bacterial transcription initiation. Biomolecules 5(2):1035-1062. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/5/2/1035/htm
- Kireeva, M., Opron, K., Seibold, S., Domecq, C., Cukier, R.I., Coulombe, B., Kashlev, M., and Burton, Z. (2102) Molecular dynamics and mutational analysis of the catalytic and translocation cycle of RNA polymerase. BMC Biophysics 5(1):11. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225281979_Molecular_dynamics_and_mutational_analysis_of_the_catalytic_and_translocation_cycle_of_RNA_polymerase/figures?lo=1
- Washburn, R.S., and Gottesman, M.E. (2015) Regulation of transcription elongation and termination. Biomolecules 5(2):1063-1078. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4496710/pdf/biomolecules-05-01063.pdf
- Zenkin, N., and Yuzenkova, Y. (2015) New insights into the functions of transcription factors that bind the RNA polymerase secondary channel. Biomolecules 5(3):1195-1209. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/5/3/1195/htm
- Gocheva, V., LeGall, A., Boudvillain, M., Margeat, E., and Nollmann, M. (2015) Direct observation of the translocation mechanism of transcription termination factor Rho. Nuc Acids Res 43(1):10.1093. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272162172_Direct_observation_of_the_translocation_mechanism_of_transcription_termination_factor_Rho
- Miki, T.S., Carl, S.H., and Groβhans, H. (2017) Two disctinct transcription termination modes dictated by promoters. Genes & Dev 31:1-10. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320350041_Two_distinct_transcription_termination_modes_dictated_by_promoters
- Gurumurthy, A., Shen, Y., Gunn, E.M., Bungert, J. (2018) Phase separation and transcription regulation: Are Super-Enhancers and Locus Control Regions primary sites of transcription complex assembly? BioEssays 1800164. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329331157_Phase_Separation_and_Transcription_Regulation_Are_Super-Enhancers_and_Locus_Control_Regions_Primary_Sites_of_Transcription_Complex_Assembly
- Suñé-Pou, M., Prieto-Sánchez, Boyero-Corral, S., Moreno-Castro, C., El Yousfi, Y., Suñé-Negre, J.M., Hernández-Munain, C., and Suñé, C. (2017) Targeting splicing in the treatment of human disease. Genes 8(3):87. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/8/3/87/htm
- Schaughency, P., Merran, J., and Corden J.L. (2014) Genome-wide mapping of yeast RNA polymerase II termination. PLOS Genetics 10(10):e1004632 Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1004632
- Nourse, J., Spada, S., and Danckwardt, S. (2020) Emerging roles of RNA 3'-end cleavage and polyadenylation in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy of human disorders. Biomolecules 10(6):915. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/10/6/915/htm
- Wikipedia contributors. (2020, July 30). Five-prime cap. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 05:53, August 11, 2020, from https://en.Wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Five-prime_cap&oldid=970240533
- Cortes, T. and Cox, R.A. (2015) Transcription and translation of the rpsJ, rplN and rRNA operons of the tubercle bacillus. Microbiology (2015) 161:719-728. Available at: https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/docserver/fulltext/micro/161/4/719_mic000037.pdf?expires=1597159574&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=6FFC9C066EF41C7799FAE843CE94C49F
- Hein, P.P. and Landick, R. (2010) The bridge helix coordinates movements of modules in RNA polymerase. BMC Biology 8:141. Available at: https://bmcbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1741-7007-8-141
- Gonatopoulos-Pournatzis, T., and Cowling, V.H. (2014) Cap-binding complex (CBC). Biochem. J. 457:231-242. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259392894_Cap-binding_complex_CBC